Re-Thinking the F-35

About 2 years ago, I had a conversation with a flag officer who was involved with the F-35 program. We discussed the negative reputation it has with the public.

I have alluded to this conversation over the years and warned that the piling on hate over the F-35 has gone way off into insanity.

F-35 on carrier deck.

What the flag told me, and explained why they wanted the F-35 was eye opening. And no…it has very, very little to do with stealth. Think more along the line of your smart-phone and apps.

Also…it has been publicly acknowledged that the F-35 testing was initially limited for safety reasons. Translation — They needed to learn HOW to fly the plane and then slowly push it’s performance envelope.

They have gone way beyond where they were 2 years ago. And even Red Flag adversaries are starting to wonder what the egg-heads did to the F-35 to make it so much more effective that they keep getting killed by them in training.

Now for the inevitable, “Just make more F-22’s”. Yes, the F-22 is a neat aircraft. But consider two things: One, the F-22 wasn’t designed to do half the things the F-35 does. Actually…if I were being asked, I would name the F-35 more like a F/A-35.

And secondly, the F-35 has actually been flying for 10 years. Yes. Really. The F-22 has been flying for 20 years. Yes..really! That is 20 years the USAF has had to think, tweak, try, fly and predict where they want to go in the future. Example – If stealth is dead, would you build the F-22 the same or change a lot about it? What would you call that? A F-22B? Or with zero stealth? The F-23?

In closing, I am not a fighter pilot. I see and read all the same things everyone else does. But USAF guys who know about such things seem quite eager about the F-35. I do have to defer to them somewhat.
Watching “Top Gun” 47 times as a kid doesn’t make me or my civilian peers experts on fighter / attack/ bomber planes. But I do remember the days when the F-14 was considered an over-complicated, underpowered flying trash can.

I remember when old Armor guys where swearing up and down the Striker was going to get people killed and Gen. Shinseki was a sellout for pushing it.

I remember when “gun experts” swore up and down that the M-16 was a BB-gun and the M-14 was the greatest, most accurate, most lethal rifle ever made (sic).

V/STOL Version of the F-35 used by the USMC

I could go on. But if you are intellectually honest you have to at least acknowledge that the success or failure of the F-35 hasn’t been written yet. And we haven’t even talked about the USMC B-variant that, if successful, could be the land anywhere game changer the Gripen and Harrier wanted to be.

To be continued….

 

 

Marky
www.John1911.com
“Shooting Guns & Having Fun”

Marky Mark

Marky Mark

Writer at John1911.com
Writer for john1911.com. Co-Host of the John1911 Podcast. Video content provider for John1911-TV.

Areas of focus: Defense and National Security, Modern Light Weapons, Analysis of the Geo-political / Military Relationship in the Context of Strategic Goals.
Marky Mark

Latest posts by Marky Mark (see all)

  • Brennen Munro

    I just found some time to view the video of the F35 at the Paris airshow… I’m impressed. To watch those big horizontal stabilizers working independently of one another is kind of shocking to see, and not to mention that it seems to have a much tighter turning radius than even the sharp turning F16. Just wow! I had seen it fly earlier and thought that it was a very under-powered air pig, so I am not sure what they did to increase the parameters of the performance of the engine, but it is putting out much more juice than when I had seen it. Once they have all of the gee golly wiz kid stuff working, it is going to be a really scary beast that I am glad is going to be on our side.

    I do wonder just how much of the really high tech stuff we will be sharing with everyone else though. I am sure that Israel will have access to all the top shelf stuff as they helped design some of it. They even have one that they have been flying as an airborne test-bed. I would just really hate to see one fall into a potential adversaries possession…

    Munro

    • IDF took possession of at least one production F-35 a few weeks ago. Maybe a month.

      As for the power, no change. They are just flying it more aggressively now. My understanding is it’s being allowed to pull more G’s than before.

      Marky

    • Tomas Nordstrand

      No one else of the experts in the field were impressed!

      • Brennen Munro

        I never claimed to be an “expert”, I just made the observation that the performance parameters were hugely increased from when I had seen it fly before.

        Munro

        • That was from a professional troll account. No worries, Brennen.

          Marky

          • Brennen Munro

            Thanks Marky, I was kind of puzzled as to his comment to me.

            Munro

  • Tomas Nordstrand

    where did you get this or your “friend” this silly idea of apps and smart phones? the f35 is far far from this thech with the 3i and eventually the so called full warfighting capability ready 3F. Maybe and this app type of sys architectur, and this is a big maybe, will be true for the Block 4 amd not the A version but the D. This is at the earliest projected 2025.

    • Brennen Munro

      I am a former aircraft mechanic whose specialty was composites and compound curvatures of metals, and I still have a true love of things that fly… I am curious as to your background and why you feel this way about this aircraft? Understand me, I am not trying to “call out” your credentials, I am just curious about why you seem so sure about this aircraft not being able to perform as described until it has reached at least the “D” model iteration?

      Munro

      • No worries I did. A little digging shows that was a professional troll account that targets F-35 posts.

        Not a real person.

        Banned and deleted.

        Marky

        • Brennen Munro

          One of the things that made me wonder just who was this guy was that I had and exchange with a guy on one of the aviation sites who was trying to convince everyone that the USA was creating knock-offs of Chinese aircraft. Not sure what that guy was about either… oh well. Thanks again!

          Munro

          • That was likely a troll-Farm account as well.

            Marky